33 . Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally, the main objectives on the police is to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and over all, be certain law and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The regulation enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair on the offender and the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other Courts, but they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.
The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a lot of this power casts an obligation to the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for just a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Read more
fourteen. While in the light on the position explained over, it really is concluded that a civil servant contains a fundamental right to become promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but couldn't be regarded for no fault of his very own and meanwhile he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency inside the length of service or during the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 433 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
This ruling has conditions, and Because the petitioners failed a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based about the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above facts and circumstances on the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 on the Constitution. Read more
This Court may well interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a very manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding reached via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In the event the summary or finding is for instance no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court may perhaps interfere with the summary or even the finding and mold the relief to really make it acceptable into the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-appreciate the evidence or the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified through the decision in the Supreme Court while in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
As the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be reached, therefore the decision with the Supreme Court needs being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) from the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on more info this. Read more
Within the United States, consumers are not needed to hire an attorney to represent them in either civil or criminal matters. Laypeople navigating the legal system on their very own can remember a person rule of thumb when it involves referring to case regulation or precedent in court documents: be as specific as feasible, leading the court, not only for the case, but on the section and paragraph containing the pertinent information.
11 . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is a free and democratic nation, and once a person becomes a major she or he can marry whosoever he/she likes; In case the parents with the boy or Lady do not approve of these kinds of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they will do if they might cut off social relations with the son or the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Female who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man who is a major, the couple is neither harassed by anybody nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who offers these threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to activity by instituting criminal proceedings because of the police against these persons and further stern action is taken against these kinds of person(s) as provided by legislation.
On June sixteen, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf of your boy by a guardian advertisement litem, against DCFS, the social worker, along with the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf of the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian advertisement litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court for the dismissal based on absolute immunity, because they were all performing in their Work opportunities with DCFS.
Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives of your police is always to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and higher than all, be certain legislation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The law enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair on the offender and also the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and also from other Courts, Nevertheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.
This page contains slip opinions. Slip opinions are the opinions that are filed over the working day that the appellate court issues its decision and will often be not the court's final opinion.
The reason for this difference is that these civil law jurisdictions adhere to the tradition that the reader should be capable of deduce the logic from the decision and the statutes.[4]
156 . Const. P. 1015/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Saleem Jehangir V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is also important to note that neither seniority nor promotion could be the vested right of a civil servant, therefore, neither any seniority nor any promotion may very well be claimed or granted without the actual length of service on account of vested rights. The purpose of prescribing a particular size of service for becoming entitled for being viewed as for promotion to some higher quality, of course, isn't without logic as being the officer who's in the beginning inducted to a particular post needs to provide on the mentioned post to gain experience to hold the next higher post also to serve the public in the befitting manner.
Criminal cases From the common regulation tradition, courts decide the law applicable to your case by interpreting statutes and applying precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. In contrast to most civil legislation systems, common regulation systems follow the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their very own previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all decreased courts should make decisions dependable with the previous decisions of higher courts.